Introducing the Talmud

Comment

Comment by verndewd on February 9, 2009 at 3:42am

OK, so it’s the only complete english version. Thats why it’s very unlikely you will have heard of this stuff before.
Bava Metzia 33a
Study of Talmud superior to study of Mishnah and Bible
Sanhedrin 59a:
1) Non-Jew who studies Torah (“whole” Torah, ie both oral and written, ie Talmud and Bible) is liable for execution”
2) God only gave the “Torah” to the Jewish people
3) Non-Jew who studies “whole” Torah is said to be “stealing from the Jewish people”.
4) Non-Jew liable for execution under the 7 Noahide laws.
5) Non-Jew studying “whole” Torah is likened to a non-Jew who had sexual intercourse with a “betrothed girl”, therefore a non-Jew who studies the “whole” Torah is guilty of a sexual sin, “another of the seven Noahide laws” and is “liable to death by stoning”.
bava metzia 59b pt1
Bava Metzia 59b continued
1) Rabbis no longer “pay attention to heavenly voices”
2) God must submit to a “majority vote” of the rabbis, “even where God himself holds the opposite view”
3) God admits rabbis defeated Him with their arguments.
Sanhedrin 43a, 52b, 55a
43a) Jesus “practiced sorcery, incited and led Israel astray.
52b) A grown Jewish man can only be liable for commiting adultery if he has sexual intercourse with a Jewish woman.
If he had sexual intercourse with a non-jewish woman he is not liable for commiting adultery because a non-Jewish woman is not considered a “neighbour”.
55a) No concern for disgrace among non-Jews regarding bestiality because it was “not incommon among them”
Sanhedrin 58b
1) Non-Jew is liable for execution if he ceased working for a “whole day”.
2) Jew commanded to observe a weekly day of rest.
3) Non-Jew is forbidden to cease working for an entire day.
4) Non-Jew is forbidden from taking a day of rest any day of the week.
Non-jew is liable for execution if he does take an entire day of rest any day of the week.
5) Noahide laws do not contradict the above ruling.
Bava Metzia 114b
1) Graves of non-Jews do not defile with “tent impurity”
2) Non-jews are “not called men”.
3) Only Jews are called men.
Sanhedrin 57a
1) Non-Jew put to death for violation of any of the 7 commandments (7 Noahide laws)
2) A Jew is permitted to steal from a non-Jew.
3) If a non-Jew steals from a Jew or another non-Jew “he is liable for execution”
Sanhedrin 57b
1) Non-jew put to death by single judge and testimony of a single witness.
2) Jew only “put to death by a court of 23 judges” and the testimony of two male witnesses. “None of these rules apply to non-Jews”.
3) Non jew put to death “even for killing a fetus”. A Jew is exempt from execution in the same stuation, even if he struck a pregnant woman and caused her to miscarry.
Sanhedrin 58b
1) Non-Jew who strikes a Jew is liable for execution
2) Someone who hits a Jew, it is considered as if he hit “Shekhimah” (or Shekhinah), ie the Divine Presence of God.
3) Jews are considerd men, by inference non-Jews are not.
(See Bava Metzia 114b)
Sanhedrin 58b
1) Non-Jew liable for having anal intercourse with his wife.
2) Jew NOT liable for having anal intercourse with his wife.
3) Non-Jew NOT liable for having anal intercourse with another mans wife.
4) Jew may NOT have vaginal intercourse with another mans wife, but he is NOT forbidden from having anal intercourse with another mans wife.
Sanhedrin 55b
A girl 3 years and 1 day old may be “given away in betrothal by her father by way of sexual intercourse with her bridegroom”.
Kebutot 11a, 11b
A girl under the age of 3 who had sexual intercourse with a man is still considered a virgin because her hymen will grow back.
Sexual intercourse with a girl less than 3 years old is not “considered a significant sexual act”.
It is like putting a finger in the eye: as the tear that is shed is replaced, “so too will the virginity of the little girl who is less than three years old be restored” because her hymen will grow back.

Comment by verndewd on February 9, 2009 at 3:40am

http://www.gnn.tv/threads/22511/The_Talmud_is_Disgusting