2009 Beijing China Mandarin Luxury Hotel Fire Before & After Video Compared to WTC 7 普通话火

Watch this video also. It will blow your mind:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9nE37...

Fire has gutted a 44-storey luxury hotel, The unfinished 159-metre Mandarin Oriental hotel, being built as part of China's landmark television headquarters complex in downtown Beijing.

The authorities suspect the blaze could have been sparked by an Olympics-style fireworks display set off on the final day of Chinese New Year celebrations on Monday night, the agency said.

Promote

0 members promoted this

Rating:

Currently 3/5 stars.
1
2
3
4
5

Get Embed Code

Tags:

Comment

You need to be a member of i-Tube to add comments!

Join i-Tube

Comment by Mitsos on May 14, 2009 at 5:50am: "WTC 7 was made of marshmallow... "

The buildings were made to withstand multiple crashes of airplanes and the builder forgot to put fires in to their calculation? Lol
The smooth going down of the building in free-fall and the pulverization of concrete, the smooth collapse in it's foot print are all clear give aways. Also thermite was found in the rubble. See my Danish video
The guy also ignores that Busg was exposed as liar. Bush WAS forewarned and the American army DID envision an attack on the WTC and the Pentagon and prepared for it. The Pentagon had it's own air defenses but those did,'t "work" either. Nobody was punished but instead promoted. Those facts alone should be enough for anybody with common sense to make his decision if it was an inside job. The sun does not exist if you deny it's existence = Debunkers

Comment by DVW on May 13, 2009 at 8:51pm: WTC 7 was made of marshmallow...

Comment by ☠Realize Lies☠ on May 13, 2009 at 6:38pm: shit, i apologize for that link i posted.. its bullshit... it's basically insinuating that these two buildings are somewhat similar in construction.... we know that is FALSE... my bad... by regardless... my point is ALSO valid =)

Comment by ☠Realize Lies☠ on May 13, 2009 at 6:33pm: true... but using your best judgment,.. well mine best judgement at least, because I've lived most of my "employed life" in the construction business and understand perfectly the way concrete and rebar works... its quite different and extremely less structured then lets say just steel I-beams... but regardless.... the debate between the Beijing building and WTC7 is pretty irrelevant....

http://www.ae911truth.org/info/47

Comment by inspector12 radio on May 13, 2009 at 6:22pm: YOU CAN'T DEBATE FACTS LIKE THAT DELETE......... "TRUTHERS" WILL COME UP WITH SOME OTHER EXCUSE.
ALEX JONES AND THE OTHER MONEY MAKERS HAVE THEM BRAIN WASHED TO BELIEVE LIES

Comment by ☠Realize Lies☠ on May 13, 2009 at 6:20pm: NOOO, the Oklahoma city building was NOT a "concrete cased steel structure"... it was built entirely of reinforced concrete.

Reinforced concrete is concrete in which steel reinforcement bars ("rebars"), plates or fibers have been incorporated to strengthen a material that would otherwise be brittle. In industrialised countries, nearly all concrete used in construction is reinforced concrete.

Comment by ☠Realize Lies☠ on May 13, 2009 at 6:12pm: oh... and BTW... THIS building below... the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building ... was constructed with reinforced concrete ... unlike the WTC7 building.... lets not forget that WTC7 was basically "the fortress" of all the WTC's... if you've seen this building up close and not on television... you'd understand what I'm saying... that building was no joke =)

Comment by ☠Realize Lies☠ on May 13, 2009 at 6:05pm: YES there was damage to WTC7, and there's actually better images then the one posted below of the damage, just Google Image search it... BUT... my argument would be... well... look at the amount of damage with WTC7 and compare it to that of the oklahoma city bombing?! Granted, it may be somewhat different circumstances... but still... I mean...... yeah....