Health Care Bill Explained .... (H.R. 3200)

Just in case there’s any confusion between what the gov’t is saying they’re doing with health care and what they’re really planning to do.....

Be informed folks — this is what’s happening. And if you don’t like it, you’d better start making some noise.

Enjoy and remember – the President & Congress are YOUR servants, not the other way around.

Here's a link to the bill.

Below is just a small list of an independent interpretation, I've included a link above to the bill as it stands today.... and if you'd care to dive into the larger version of this interpretation .... CLICK HERE

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pg 22 of the HC Bill
MANDATES the Govt will audit books of ALL EMPLOYERS that self insure!!

Pg 30 Sec 123
THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments/benefits you get

PG 50 Section 152
HC will be provided to ALL non US citizens, illegal or otherwise

Pg 58
Govt will have real-time access to individual’s finances & a National ID Healthcard will be issued!

Pg 59 lines 21-24
Govt will have direct access to your banks accts for electronic funds transfer

Pg 95 Lines 8-18
The Govt will use groups i.e., ACORN & Americorps to sign up individuals for Govt HC plan

PG 85 Line 7
Specs of Benefit Levels 4 Plans. #AARP members - Your Healthcare WILL be rationed

PG 102 Lines 12-18
Medicaid Eligible Individuals will be automatically enrolled in Medicaid. No choice

PG 124 lines 24-25
No company can sue GOVT on price fixing. No “judicial review” against Govt Monopoly

PG 127 Lines 1-16
Doctors/ #AMA - The Govt will tell YOU what you can make.

Pg 145 Line 15-17
An Employer MUST auto enroll employees into public opt plan. NO CHOICE

Pg 146 Lines 22-25
Employers MUST pay for HC for part time employees AND their families.

Pg 149 Lines 16-24
ANY Employer with payroll 400k & above who does not provide public opt. pays 8% tax on all payroll

PG 150 Lines 9-13
Business with payroll between 251k & 400k who doesn’t provide public opt pays 2-6% tax on all payroll

Pg 167 Lines 18-23
ANY individual who doesn’t have acceptable HC according to Govt will be taxed 2.5% of income

Pg 170 Lines 1-3
Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from individual taxes. (Americans will pay)

Pg 195
Officers & employees of HC Admin (GOVT) will have access to ALL American’s financial/personal records

PG 425 Lines 4-12
Govt mandates Advance Care Planning Consultant. Think Senior Citizens end of life

Pg 425 Lines 17-19
Govt will instruct & consult regarding living wills, durable powers of atty. Mandatory!

PG 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3
Govt provides approved list of end of life resources, guiding you in death

PG 427 Lines 15-24
Govt mandates program for orders for end of life. The Govt has a say in how your life ends

Pg 429 Lines 1-9
An “advanced care planning consultant” will be used frequently as patient’s health deteriorates

PG 429 Lines 10-12
“advanced care consultation” may include an ORDER for end of life plans. AN ORDER from GOV

Pg 429 Lines 13-25 -
The govt will specify which Doctors can write an end of life order.

PG 430 Lines 11-15
The Govt will decide what level of treatment you will have at end of life

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Promote

0 members promoted this

Comment

You need to be a member of i-Tube to add comments!

Join i-Tube

Comment by ☠Realize Lies☠ on August 15, 2009 at 4:06pm: BOB (beorn), thanks for the links below and the little info on Pete Fleckenstein.... and yeah I'd definitely be interested to hear an open debate on the subject, so please do keep me informed. As far as the Huffington Post and this Linda lady...well.. if you haven't already noticed yet I'm a bit of a conservative, so I'm not a big fan of liberal media like the "HP"... now I read some of that 'debunking' and I'm still not entirely satisfied (surprised?!)... besides, that word "debunk" has kinda become more like "altered speculations" to me.... I'm mean just for example, the Politifact.com link you made available touched on only 15 of these claims, but only 7 of them they'd claimed were completely false while the other 8 were "somewhat" or "mostly" true or whatever.... so to me, it seems with the kind of wording these authors use to create these bills leaves somewhat of a speculative gap, which in turn leaves it open to argument and individual interpretation. While I sorta agree with some of the "re-interpretation" Linda Bergthold did, I found her "commentary" to be a bit un-editor-like and somewhat annoying.... on some of her comments she came off as kinda smug and a bit smartassy... but whatever... I've already had a few drinks tonight and I'm probably just being hard-headed and opinionated at the moment...it happens... forgive me I'm human.